A modest proposal to change the name of ‘junk food’

Ever wonder how the factory stamps an "M" on these guys without cracking the candy shell?

Ever wonder how the factory stamps an “M” on these guys without cracking the candy shell?

Would it be easier to stay away from junk food if we called it something else?

It’s obviously a derogatory term, but the meaning has been hijacked by pop culture to the point that most people think of it not as commercialized crap but as a guilty pleasure. (It’s easy to scoff at somebody else’s Pop Tart fixation, so long as nobody messes with your Twinkies.)

For me, it helps to think of it as “industrial food” because that strips away the marketing glitz and all the pop culture tie-ins and reminds me that this is basically food made in a factory, as cheaply as possible.

That doesn’t have much of a ring to it, though. What if we called it fabricated food, or industrial-grade human filler? (I was going to type “human fuel,” but that would imply that this crap has some sort of nutritional value – which it rarely does.)

Any other nominations?

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A modest proposal to change the name of ‘junk food’

  1. zoeforman says:

    Crap Cuisine ? mind you that implies a chef has been near it rather than machines. Keep the list going

  2. I like calling it “unhealthy food”. It’s not very original, but that’s exactly what junk food means to me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s